Skip to content
Five in FiveImpact Alliance

Evidence

We publish only results that trace back to an evaluation, a government assessment, or a provider report, and we label how strong each one is.


The trial that set the bar

0.8 to 1.3 SD

In a multi-year randomized trial in Kenya, children gained 0.8 to 1.3 standard deviations in learning, above the 99th percentile of education interventions. Most programs move learning by about 0.1.

Read the paper

Source: Gray-Lobe, Keats, Kremer, Mbiti and Ozier (2022), Can Education Be Standardized? Evidence from Kenya

How strong is each result?

  1. Randomized controlled trialStrongest
  2. Quasi-experimentalStrong
  3. Pre/postModerate
  4. Provider-reportedIndicative

Results across the portfolio

Results use the unit each study reported, so compare them within a study rather than across studies.

ProviderWhereResultStudy type
Rising AcademiesSierra Leone+0.38 SD maths, +0.29 SD EnglishRandomized controlled trial (2022 to 2025)
TaleemabadBalochistan, Pakistan+0.23 SD UrduRandomized controlled trial
Educational Initiatives (Mindspark)Delhi, India+0.37 SD mathsRandomized controlled trial (Muralidharan et al. 2019)
PLANENigeria+0.41 SD literacy and numeracyQuasi-experimental
NewGlobe (BayelsaPRIME)Bayelsa, Nigeria+0.22 to +0.57 SD reading fluencyDifference-in-differences (2023 to 2025)
EIDUKenya+0.534 SD early literacy and numeracy (IDELA)Comparison with non-participating peers
HPPI (Kadam+)Uttar Pradesh, India84% at Grade 3 proficiency vs. 53% in similar schoolsNational Achievement Survey comparison
TaRL AfricaNigeria+26.6 percentage points more learners at target maths levelProvider-reported
See every result in the Atlas

How we check every figure

  1. 1.

    Sourced

    Every figure comes from a published evaluation, government assessment, or provider report.

  2. 2.

    Reverified

    Our team checks each figure against its original source.

  3. 3.

    Validated

    A provider is validated once its core cost and learning data are confirmed.

Read the Atlas methodology